Swarm v. Fleet v. Kubernetes v. Mesos

“There are clearly a lot of choices for orchestrating, clustering, and managing containers. That being said, the choices are generally well differentiated. In terms of orchestration, we can say the following:

  • Swarm has the advantage (and disadvantage) of using the standard Docker interface. Whilst this makes it very simple to use Swarm and to integrate it into existing workflows, it may also make it more difficult to support the more complex scheduling that may be defined in custom interfaces.
  • Fleet is a low-level and fairly simple orchestration layer that can be used as a base for running higher level orchestration tools, such as Kubernetes or custom systems.
  • Kubernetes is an opinionated orchestration tool that comes with service discovery and replication baked-in. It may require some re-designing of existing applications, but used correctly will result in a fault-tolerant and scalable system.
  • Mesos is a low-level, battle-hardened scheduler that supports several frameworks for container orchestration including Marathon, Kubernetes, and Swarm. At the time of writing, Kubernetes and Mesos are more developed and stable than Swarm. In terms of scale, only Mesos has been proven to support large-scale systems of hundreds or thousands of nodes. However, when looking at small clusters of, say, less than a dozen nodes, Mesos may be an overly complex solution…”

http://radar.oreilly.com/2015/10/swarm-v-fleet-v-kubernetes-v-mesos.html

Advertisements